“A Disease Like Any Other”? A Decade of Change in Public Reactions to Schizophrenia, Depression, and Alcohol Dependence
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in American Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 167 (11), 1321-1330
- https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09121743
Abstract
Objective: Clinicians, advocates, and policy makers have presented mental illnesses as medical diseases in efforts to overcome low service use, poor adherence rates, and stigma. The authors examined the impact of this approach with a 10-year comparison of public endorsement of treatment and prejudice. Method: The authors analyzed responses to vignettes in the mental health modules of the 1996 and 2006 General Social Survey describing individuals meeting DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, major depression, and alcohol dependence to explore whether more of the public 1) embraces neurobiological understandings of mental illness; 2) endorses treatment from providers, including psychiatrists; and 3) reports community acceptance or rejection of people with these disorders. Multivariate analyses examined whether acceptance of neurobiological causes increased treatment support and lessened stigma. Results: In 2006, 67% of the public attributed major depression to neurobiological causes, compared with 54% in 1996. High proportions of respondents endorsed treatment, with general increases in the proportion endorsing treatment from doctors and specific increases in the proportions endorsing psychiatrists for treatment of alcohol dependence (from 61% in 1996 to 79% in 2006) and major depression (from 75% in 1996 to 85% in 2006). Social distance and perceived danger associated with people with these disorders did not decrease significantly. Holding a neurobiological conception of these disorders increased the likelihood of support for treatment but was generally unrelated to stigma. Where associated, the effect was to increase, not decrease, community rejection. Conclusions: More of the public embraces a neurobiological understanding of mental illness. This view translates into support for services but not into a decrease in stigma. Reconfiguring stigma reduction strategies may require providers and advocates to shift to an emphasis on competence and inclusion.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coexpression network analysis of neural tissue reveals perturbations in developmental processes in schizophreniaGenome Research, 2010
- Public attitudes towards people with mental illness in England and Scotland, 1994–2003The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2009
- Surprising EmotionsScience, 2009
- Rethinking theoretical approaches to stigma: A Framework Integrating Normative Influences on Stigma (FINIS)Social Science & Medicine (1982), 2008
- Patterns of social distance towards people suffering from schizophrenia in Austria: a comparison between the general public, relatives and mental health staffActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2007
- Factors influencing social distance from people with schizophreniaInternational Journal of Clinical Practice, 2006
- Psychiatrists as social engineers: A study of an anti-stigma campaignSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2005
- Causal beliefs and attitudes to people with schizophreniaThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2005
- Assessing the Decade of the BrainScience, 1999
- Fighting schizophrenia and its stigmaThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1997