Use of Indirect and Mixed Treatment Comparisons for Technology Assessment
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in PharmacoEconomics
- Vol. 26 (9), 753-767
- https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826090-00006
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bias Modelling in Evidence SynthesisJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2008
- Correction: Interpretation of Random Effects Meta-analysis in Decision ModelsMedical Decision Making, 2007
- Meta‐analysis of mixed treatment comparisons at multiple follow‐up timesStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Pharmacological and lifestyle interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ, 2007
- Using mixed treatment comparisons and meta-regression to perform indirect comparisons to estimate the efficacy of biologic treatments in rheumatoid arthritisStatistics in Medicine, 2006
- Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment ComparisonsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2006
- Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidenceBMJ, 2005
- Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisonsStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Random Effects Models for Combining Results from Controlled and Uncontrolled Studies in a Meta-AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1994