Vaginal mesh – the controversy
Open Access
- 1 November 2012
- journal article
- Published by H1 Connect in F1000 Medicine Reports
- Vol. 4 (21), 21
- https://doi.org/10.3410/m4-21
Abstract
Vaginal mesh – the controversyThis publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Approach to Management of Iatrogenic Foreign Bodies of the Lower Urinary Tract Following Reconstructive Pelvic SurgeryJournal of Urology, 2012
- Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: “UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse”International Urogynecology Journal, 2011
- Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane reviewInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2011
- Follow-up after polypropylene mesh repair of anterior and posterior compartments in patients with recurrent prolapseInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2007
- The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repairInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2006
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Fascia Lata and Synthetic Mesh for Sacral ColpopexyObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene meshBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
- An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repairAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- Posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: primary repair in 693 patientsObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Abdominal Approach to Vaginal EversionClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993