The impact of shame and self-judgment on psychopathology in infertile patients
Open Access
- 4 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Human Reproduction
- Vol. 26 (9), 2408-2414
- https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der209
Abstract
Little is known about psychological processes of infertile couples pursuing medical treatment in comparison with fertile couples and adoption candidates who also suffer from infertility but are not seeking medical help. This study aims to contribute to a better understanding of these individuals in terms of psychological processes (such as external shame, internal shame and self-judgment) and their association with psychopathology, also attending to gender differences. One hundred control couples without known fertility problems [fertile group (FG)], 100 couples with an infertility diagnosis and pursuing medical treatment [infertile group (IG)], and 40 couples with an infertility diagnosis who are applying for adoption [adoption group (AG)] completed the instruments: Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Others as Shamer, Experience of Shame Scale and the Self-compassion Scale. One-way analysis of variances were used to compare the three groups demographic and study variables. Pearson correlations and linear multiple regression analysis were performed to investigate the associations between shame, self-judgment, depression and anxiety. To explore gender differences, T-tests were used. The IG group scored higher than FG and AG in measures of depression, anxiety, external shame, internal shame and self-judgment. In infertile couples, self-judgment, external shame and internal shame emerged as significant predictors of depressive symptomatology. Women with an infertility diagnosis tend to present higher levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms in comparison with fertile controls and adoption candidates. This study highlights the importance of emotional regulation processes such as internal and external shame, and self-judgment, to the understanding of psychopathological symptomatology associated with infertility. Our results suggest that these issues should be addressed in a therapeutic context with these couples. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of the infertile group, in what concerns different stages of medical diagnosis and treatment, might represent a limitation in the interpretation of our findings.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in affect and state anxiety across an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycleFertility and Sterility, 2010
- The impact of infertility diagnosis on psychological status of women undergoing fertility treatmentJournal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 2009
- Well-being and relationship satisfaction of couples dealing with an in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure: a multilevel approach on the role of self-criticism, dependency, and romantic attachmentFertility and Sterility, 2009
- Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in infertile women and men undergoing in vitro fertilization treatmentHuman Reproduction, 2008
- TARGET ARTICLE: "Putting the Self Into Self-Conscious Emotions: A Theoretical Model"Psychological Inquiry, 2004
- The Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Self-CompassionSelf and Identity, 2003
- An exploration of shame measures—II: psychopathologyPersonality and Individual Differences, 1994
- An exploration of shame measures—I: The other as Shamer scalePersonality and Individual Differences, 1994
- Proneness to shame, proneness to guilt, and psychopathology.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1992
- Psychological consequences of infertility: A longitudinal studyJournal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1991