Bioterrorism, Public Health, and Civil Liberties
Open Access
- 25 April 2002
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 346 (17), 1337-1342
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200204253461722
Abstract
The prospect of having to deal with a bioterrorist attack, especially one involving smallpox, has local, state, and federal officials rightly concerned.1,2 Before September 11, most procedures for dealing with a bioterrorist attack against the United States were based on fiction. Former President Bill Clinton became engaged in the bioterrorism issue in 1997, after reading Richard Preston's novel The Cobra Event.3 In Tom Clancy's 1996 Executive Orders, 4 the United States is attacked by terrorists using a strain of Ebola virus that is transmissible through the air. To contain the epidemic, the President declares a state of emergency, orders that all nonessential businesses and places of public assembly be closed, and suspends all interstate travel by airplane, train, bus, and automobile. In defending the order, the fictional President makes a statement that is now often used to justify major changes in our criminal laws: “The Constitution is not a suicide pact.”4Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Case for Voluntary Smallpox VaccinationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Large-Scale Quarantine Following Biological Terrorism in the United StatesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2001
- The Malevolent Use of Microbes and the Rule of Law: Legal Challenges Presented by BioterrorismClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- The Last Smallpox Epidemic in Boston and the Vaccination Controversy, 1901–1903New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- The Bell Tolls for a Constitutional Right to Physician-Assisted SuicideNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Health and Human RightsHealth and Human Rights, 1994
- Control of Tuberculosis -- The Law and the Public's HealthNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993