The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care
Top Cited Papers
- 8 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2021 (6), CD001096
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001096.pub2
Abstract
Background The opportunity to improve care by delivering decision support to clinicians at the point of care represents one of the main incentives for implementing sophisticated clinical information systems. Previous reviews of computer reminder and decision support systems have reported mixed effects, possibly because they did not distinguish point of care computer reminders from e‐mail alerts, computer‐generated paper reminders, and other modes of delivering ‘computer reminders’. Objectives To evaluate the effects on processes and outcomes of care attributable to on‐screen computer reminders delivered to clinicians at the point of care. Search methods We searched the Cochrane EPOC Group Trials register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and CENTRAL to July 2008, and scanned bibliographies from key articles. Selection criteria Studies of a reminder delivered via a computer system routinely used by clinicians, with a randomised or quasi‐randomised design and reporting at least one outcome involving a clinical endpoint or adherence to a recommended process of care. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility and abstracted data. For each study, we calculated the median improvement in adherence to target processes of care and also identified the outcome with the largest such improvement. We then calculated the median absolute improvement in process adherence across all studies using both the median outcome from each study and the best outcome. Main results Twenty‐eight studies (reporting a total of thirty‐two comparisons) were included. Computer reminders achieved a median improvement in process adherence of 4.2% (interquartile range (IQR): 0.8% to 18.8%) across all reported process outcomes, 3.3% (IQR: 0.5% to 10.6%) for medication ordering, 3.8% (IQR: 0.5% to 6.6%) for vaccinations, and 3.8% (IQR: 0.4% to 16.3%) for test ordering. In a sensitivity analysis using the best outcome from each study, the median improvement was 5.6% (IQR: 2.0% to 19.2%) across all process measures and 6.2% (IQR: 3.0% to 28.0%) across measures of medication ordering. In the eight comparisons that reported dichotomous clinical endpoints, intervention patients experienced a median absolute improvement of 2.5% (IQR: 1.3% to 4.2%). Blood pressure was the most commonly reported clinical endpoint, with intervention patients experiencing a median reduction in their systolic blood pressure of 1.0 mmHg (IQR: 2.3 mmHg reduction to 2.0 mmHg increase). Authors' conclusions Point of care computer reminders generally achieve small to modest improvements in provider behaviour. A minority of interventions showed larger effects, but no specific reminder or contextual features were significantly associated with effect magnitude. Further research must identify design features and contextual factors consistently associated with larger improvements in provider behaviour if computer reminders are to succeed on more than a trial and error basis.Keywords
This publication has 394 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Cluster Randomized Trial of Decision Support Strategies for Reducing Antibiotic Use in Acute BronchitisJAMA Internal Medicine, 2013
- Fall Prevention in Acute Care HospitalsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2010
- An Electronic Health Record–Based Intervention to Improve Tobacco Treatment in Primary CareJAMA Internal Medicine, 2009
- Patient and Physician Reminders to Promote Colorectal Cancer ScreeningJAMA Internal Medicine, 2009
- Impact of Computerized Decision Support on Blood Pressure Management and Control: A Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Impact of an Automated Test Results Management System on Patients' Satisfaction About Test Result CommunicationArchives of Internal Medicine, 2007
- Use of a Registry-generated Audit, Feedback, and Patient Reminder Intervention in an Internal Medicine Resident Clinic—A Randomized TrialJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Improving Osteoporosis Screening: Results from a Randomized Cluster TrialJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient OutcomesJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2005
- The Impact of Reminder-Recall Interventions on Low Vaccination Coverage in an Inner-City PopulationArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2004