On measuring selection in experimental evolution
Open Access
- 1 September 2010
- journal article
- editorial material
- Published by The Royal Society in Biology Letters
- Vol. 7 (2), 210-213
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0580
Abstract
Distributions of mutation fitness effects from evolution experiments are available in an increasing number of species, opening the way for a vast array of applications in evolutionary biology. However, comparison of estimated distributions among studies is hampered by inconsistencies in the definitions of fitness effects and selection coefficients. In particular, the use of ratios of Malthusian growth rates as ‘relative fitnesses’ leads to wrong inference of the strength of selection. Scaling Malthusian fitness by the generation time may help overcome this shortcoming, and allow accurate comparison of selection coefficients across species. For species reproducing by binary fission (neglecting cellular death), ln2 can be used as a correction factor, but in general, the growth rate and generation time of the wild-type should be provided in studies reporting distribution of mutation fitness effects. I also discuss how density and frequency dependence of population growth affect selection and its measurement in evolution experiments.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mutational fitness effects in RNA and single-stranded DNA viruses: common patterns revealed by site-directed mutagenesis studiesPhilosophical Transactions B, 2010
- Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coliNature, 2009
- The Evolution of Epistasis and Its Links With Genetic Robustness, Complexity and Drift in a Phenotypic Model of AdaptationGenetics, 2009
- The distribution of fitness effects of new mutationsNature Reviews Genetics, 2007
- Adaptive Divergence in Experimental Populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. III. Mutational Origins of Wrinkly Spreader DiversityGenetics, 2007
- Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter ProteinsScience, 2006
- Distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations before selection in experimental populations of bacteriaNature Genetics, 2006
- The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief historyNature Reviews Genetics, 2005
- Fixation Probability Favors Increased Fecundity Over Reduced Generation TimeGenetics, 2004
- Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and Divergence During 2,000 GenerationsThe American Naturalist, 1991