Blood Pressure Monitoring Technique Impacts Hypertension Treatment
- 8 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 27 (6), 623-629
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1937-9
Abstract
In 2005 the American Heart Association (AHA) released updated recommendations for blood pressure (BP) monitoring in order to ensure accurate BP measurements. To determine if current methods of BP assessment in an ambulatory clinic result in significantly different BP measurements than those obtained by following the AHA recommendations and if these BP differences impact treatment decisions. Randomized prospective analysis. University of New Mexico Hospital Adult Internal Medicine clinic. Forty adults with hypertension Patient BPs were measured using both the traditional triage method and the AHA-recommended method in cross-over fashion in random order. Two complete medical profile summaries were then constructed for each patient: one for each BP measurement obtained by each technique. These profiles were then reviewed by a panel of providers who provided hypothetical hypertension treatment recommendations. Individual BP results varied greatly between the two methods. SBP readings differed by ≥5 mmHg in either direction for 68% of patients while 78% of patient’s DBP readings differed by ≥2 mmHg in either direction. Overall, 93% of patients had a BP difference of either ≥5 mmHg systolic or ≥2 mmHg diastolic. Five patients were determined to be at goal with the triage method, but were higher than their goal BP with the AHA method Significant differences were also seen in treatment recommendations for a given patient based on the differences seen between the two obtained BP readings. The number of patients with treatment variations between their two profiles ranged from 13% to 23% depending on the reviewing provider (p < 0.01 for all providers). Inaccurate BP assessment is common and may impact hypertension treatment decisions.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Difference in Blood Pressure Readings with Mercury and Automated Devices: Impact on Hypertension Prevalence Estimates in Dar es Salaam, TanzaniaEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2006 UpdateCirculation, 2006
- Brief report: How well do clinic-based blood pressure measurements agree with the mercury standard?Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2005
- Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental AnimalsCirculation, 2005
- Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood PressureHypertension, 2003
- Effect of standard cuff on blood pressure readings in patients with obese arms. How frequent are arms of a ‘large circumference’?Blood Pressure Monitoring, 2003
- Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension?Journal of Human Hypertension, 2003
- Inter-arm differences in blood pressure: when are they clinically significant?Journal Of Hypertension, 2002
- Influence of arm position on measurement of blood pressure.BMJ, 1984
- Miscuffing: inappropriate blood pressure cuff application.Cell Metabolism, 1983