Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research
Open Access
- 13 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 294 (2), 218-228
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.2.218
Abstract
Clinical research on important questions about the efficacy of medical interventions is sometimes followed by subsequent studies that either reach opposite conclusions or suggest that the original claims were too strong. Such disagreements may upset clinical practice and acquire publicity in both scientific circles and in the lay press. Several empirical investigations have tried to address whether specific types of studies are more likely to be contradicted and to explain observed controversies. For example, evidence exists that small studies may sometimes be refuted by larger ones.1,2Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure or left-ventricular dysfunction: a systematic overview of data from individual patientsThe Lancet, 2000
- Dose and Dose Intensity as Determinants of Outcome in the Adjuvant Treatment of Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998