Clinical Workflow Considerations for Implementation of Continuous-Bed-Motion PET/CT
- 21 April 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Society of Nuclear Medicine in Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
- Vol. 44 (2), 55-58
- https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.116.172171
Abstract
Within the last three years, a new type of technology has emerged for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging that uses a continuous bed motion (CBM) acquisition. For technologists, this technology requires some modifications of the standard approach to PET protocols and imaging workflows. There are a number of key things technologists needs to learn and understand when transitioning from traditional Step and Shoot (SS) PET imaging to this new technology including the difference in acquisition types, image quality, protocol setup, and finally the impact CBM can have on workflow. This article provides key information on how CBM differs from SS and focuses on the critical items technologist may encounter when using this technology.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison of novel continuous bed motion versus traditional bed position whole-body PET/CT imagingEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2015
- Performance evaluation of the Biograph mCT Flow PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard.EJNMMI Physics, 2015
- Motion Freeze for Respiration Motion Correction in PET/CT: A Preliminary Investigation with Lung Cancer Patient DataBioMed Research International, 2014
- Positron emission tomography scanning in malignant melanomaCancer, 2000