Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by SAGE Publications in Politics & Society
- Vol. 37 (1), 131-161
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329208329755
Abstract
This article explores a particular pattern of wartime violence, the relative absence of sexual violence on the part of many armed groups. This neglected fact has important policy implications: If some groups do not engage in sexual violence, then rape is not inevitable in war as is sometimes claimed, and there are stronger grounds for holding responsible those groups that do engage in sexual violence. After developing a theoretical framework for understanding the observed variation in wartime sexual violence, the article analyzes the puzzling absence of sexual violence on the part of the secessionist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam of Sri Lanka.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Front and Center: Sexual Violence in U.S. Military LawPolitics & Society, 2009
- The Existence of Group Cohesion in the Armed ForcesArmed Forces & Society, 2007
- Building the Tamil Eelam State: emerging state institutions and forms of governance in LTTE-controlled areas in Sri LankaThird World Quarterly, 2006
- Does Social Cohesion Determine Motivation in Combat?Armed Forces & Society, 2006
- The Word of CommandArmed Forces & Society, 2006
- Combat Motivation in Today’s SoldiersArmed Forces & Society, 2006
- Handling and Manhandling Civilians in Civil WarAmerican Political Science Review, 2006
- Ethnonationalist networks and transnational opportunities: the Sri Lankan Tamil diasporaReview of International Studies, 2004
- Claiming Spaces, Changing Places: Political Violence and Women's Protests in KwaZulu-NatalJournal of Southern African Studies, 2000
- Cohesion and Disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War IIPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1948