Applying a Generic Juvenile Risk Assessment Instrument to a Local Context
- 1 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Crime & Delinquency
- Vol. 53 (4), 552-580
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128706293689
Abstract
This article examines issues raised by the application of a generic actuarial juvenile risk instrument (the Model Risk Assessment Instrument) to New York City, a context different from the one in which it was developed. It describes practical challenges arising from the constraints of locally available data and local sensibilities and highlights important differences between locally relevant recidivism predictors and generic tool predictors. The analysis shows that the generic tool is less predictive than a locally developed risk-assessment tool and also performs less well than unassisted clinical judgment. This is true even after the generic tool has been validated and optimized on local data. This is because the tool does not include key demographic variables relevant to the New York City context.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Risk Assessment: Old Problems and New ApplicationsCrime & Delinquency, 2006
- Reliability and Validity Analyses of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management InventoryCriminal Justice and Behavior, 2005
- The Empirical Validation of an Instrument to Predict Risk of Recidivism Among Juvenile OffendersResearch on Social Work Practice, 2002
- The Probation Officers' Search for Credibility: Ball Park RecommendationsCrime & Delinquency, 1985
- Comparison and combination of clinical and statistical predictions of recidivism among adult offenders.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983
- Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Prediction in Parole Decision MakingLaw & Society Review, 1982
- Estimating coefficients in linear models: It don't make no nevermind.Psychological Bulletin, 1976
- Some Factors in Sentencing PolicyThe Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1967
- Prediction Tables as Accounting Devices for Judges and Parole BoardsCrime & Delinquency, 1962
- The Efficacy of Alternative Approaches to Parole PredictionAmerican Sociological Review, 1955