Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition
Open Access
- 1 January 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Global Health Action
- Vol. 12 (1), 1666695
- https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1666695
Abstract
Background: mHealth applications assist workflow, help move towards equitable access to care, and facilitate care delivery. They have great potential to impact care in low-resource countries, but have significant ethical concerns pertaining to patient autonomy, safety, and justice. Objective: To achieve consensus among stakeholders on how to address concerns pertaining to autonomy, safety, and justice among mHealth developers and users in low-resource settings, in particular for the application of image-based consultation for diagnostic support. Methods: A consensus approach was taken during a three-day workshop using a purposive sample of global mHealth stakeholders (n = 27) professionally and geographically spread. Throughout a series of introductory talks, group brainstorming, plenary reviews, and synthesis by the moderators, lists of actions were generated that address the concerns engendered by mHealth applications on autonomy, justice and safety, taking into account the development, implementation, and scale-up phases of an mHealth application lifecycle. Results: Several types of actions were recommended; key ones among them included building in risk mitigation measures from the development stage, establishing inclusive consultation processes, using open sources platform whenever possible, training all clinical users, and bearing in mind that the gold standard of care is face-to-face consultation with the patient. Recommendations of patient, community and health system participation and of governance were identified as cutting across the mHealth lifecycle. Conclusion: Priorities agreed-upon at the meeting echo those put forward concerning other domains and locations of application of mHealth. Those more forcefully articulated are the need to adopt and maintain participatory processes as well as promoting self-governance. They are expected to cut across the mHealth lifecycle and are prerequisites to the safeguard of autonomy, safety and justice.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Privacy and Security in Mobile Health Apps: A Review and RecommendationsJournal of Medical Systems, 2014
- Technology and its ethics in nursing and caring journalsNursing Ethics, 2014
- The ethics of clinical photography and social mediaMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2014
- Systematic review on what works, what does not work and why of implementation of mobile health (mHealth) projects in AfricaBMC Public Health, 2014
- Mobile Clinical Decision Support Systems and Applications: A Literature and Commercial ReviewJournal of Medical Systems, 2014
- Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technologyJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2013
- Rx For The ‘Blockbuster Drug’ Of Patient EngagementHealth Affairs, 2013
- Introducing new technology safelyHeart, 2010
- Ethical analysis to improve decision-making on health technologiesBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2008
- Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related ErrorsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2003