Automatic measurement of epithelium differentiation and classification of cervical intraneoplasia by computerized image analysis
Open Access
- 22 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Diagnostic Pathology
- Vol. 5 (1), 7
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-5-7
Abstract
The feasibility of evaluating an objective grading of cervical intraneoplasia lesions (CIN) is attempted using an automatic computerized system able to measure several valuable parameters with special reference to epithelium differentiation. 4 groups of 10 images each were selected at random from 68 consensus images coming from 80 archival cervical biopsies, normal (n = 10), CIN 1 (n = 10), CIN 2 (n = 10), CIN 3 (n = 10). Representative images of lesions were captured from the microscopic slides and were analyzed using mathematical morphology, with special reference toVoronoï tessellation and Delaunay triangulation. Epithelium surface, nuclear and cytoplasm area, triangle edge and area, total and upper nuclear index were precisely measured in each lesion, and discriminant coefficients were calculated therewith. A dilation/erosion coefficient was automatically defined using triangle edge length and nuclear radius in order to measure the epithelium ratio of differentiation. A histogram ratio was also automatically established between total nuclei and upper nuclei on top of differentiated epithelium. With the latter two ratios added to the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio, a cervical score able to classify CIN is proposed. There is a quasi-linear increase of mean cervical score values between normal epithelium and CIN 3: (27) for normal epithelium, (51) for CIN 1, (78) for CIN 2 and (100) for CIN 3, with significant differences (P < 0.05). Our results highlight the possibility of applying a cervical score for the automatic grading of CIN lesions and thereby assisting the pathologist for improvement of grading. The automatic measure of epithelium differentiation ratio appears to be a new interesting parameter in computerized image analysis of cervical lesions.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Reproducibility of CIN Diagnoses Among Different PathologistsAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2009
- Theory of sampling and its application in tissue based diagnosisDiagnostic Pathology, 2009
- Ahmedabad tolerance induction protocol and chronic renal allograft dysfunction: pathologic observations and clinical implicationsDiagnostic Pathology, 2009
- How to measure image quality in tissue-based diagnosis (diagnostic surgical pathology)Diagnostic Pathology, 2008
- Reproducibility of the Histological Diagnosis of Cervical Dysplasia Among Pathologists From 4 ContinentsInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology, 2008
- CK17 and p16 expression patterns distinguish (atypical) immature squamous metaplasia from high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN III)Histopathology, 2007
- Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: Qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issuesGynecologic Oncology, 2005
- Exploratory analysis of quantitative histopathology of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Objectivity, reproducibility, malignancy‐associated changes, and human papillomavirusCytometry Part A, 2004
- Inter- and intra-observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical squamous in traepithelial lesion susing a modified Bethesda grading systemBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- Pathologist variation in reporting cervical borderline epithelial abnormalities and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1995