Should Stroke Victims Routinely Receive Supplemental Oxygen?
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Stroke
- Vol. 30 (10), 2033-2037
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.10.2033
Abstract
Background and Purpose —We sought to test the hypothesis that breathing 100% oxygen for the first 24 hours after an acute stroke would not reduce mortality, impairment, or disability. Methods —Subjects admitted to the Central Hospital of Akershus, Norway, with stroke onset Results —One-year survival was 69% in the oxygen group and 73% in the control group (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.19; P =0.30). Impairment scores and disability scores were comparable 7 months after stroke. Among patients with Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) scores of ≥40, 82% in the oxygen group and 91% in the control group survived (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.90; P =0.023). For patients with SSS scores of P =0.54). Conclusions —Supplemental oxygen should not routinely be given to nonhypoxic stroke victims with minor or moderate strokes. Further research is needed to give conclusive advice concerning oxygen supplementation for patients with severe strokes.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hyperbaric oxygen after global cerebral ischemia in rabbits does not promote brain lipid peroxidationCritical Care Medicine, 1995
- Cardiopulmonary-cerebral resuscitation with 100% oxygen exacerbates neurological dysfunction following nine minutes of normothermic cardiac arrest in dogsResuscitation, 1994
- Do stroke units save lives?The Lancet, 1993
- Background Review and Current Concepts of Reperfusion InjuryArchives of Neurology, 1990
- Changes in xanthine oxidase in ischemic rat brainJournal of Neurosurgery, 1989
- LIPID PEROXIDATION, OXYGEN RADICALS, CELL DAMAGE, AND ANTIOXIDANT THERAPYThe Lancet, 1984
- Hyperoxia enhances lung and liver nuclear superoxide generationBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, 1984