Efficacy of interventions used by physiotherapists for patients with headache and migraine—systematic review and meta-analysis
- 30 July 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Cephalalgia
- Vol. 36 (5), 474-492
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102415597889
Abstract
Aim We aimed to conduct a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of interventions used by physiotherapists on the intensity, frequency and duration of migraine, tension-type (TTH) and cervicogenic headache (CGH). Methods We performed a systematic search of electronic databases and a hand search for controlled trials. A risk of bias analysis was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB). Meta-analyses present the combined mean effects; sensitivity analyses evaluate the influence of methodological quality. Results Of 77 eligible trials, 26 were included in the RoB assessment. Twenty trials were included in meta-analyses. Nineteen out of 26 trials had a high RoB in >1 domain. Meta-analyses of all trials indicated a reduction of TTH (p < 0.0001; mean reduction −1.11 on a 0–10 visual analog scale (VAS); 95% CI −1.64 to −0.57) and CGH (p = 0.0002; mean reduction −2.52 on a 0–10 VAS; 95% CI −3.86 to −1.19) pain intensity, CGH frequency (p < 0.00001; mean reduction −1.34 days per month; 95% CI −1.40 to −1.28), and migraine (p = 0.0001; mean reduction −22.39 hours without relief; 95% CI −33.90 to −10.88) and CGH (p < 0.00001; mean reduction −1.68 hours per day; 95% CI −2.09 to −1.26) duration. Excluding high RoB trials increased the effect sizes and reached additional statistical significance for migraine pain intensity (p < 0.00001; mean reduction −1.94 on a 0–10 VAS; 95% CI −2.61 to −1.27) and frequency (p < 0.00001; mean reduction −9.07 days per month; 95% CI −9.52 to −8.62). Discussion Results suggest a statistically significant reduction in the intensity, frequency and duration of migraine, TTH and CGH. Pain reduction and reduction in CGH frequency do not reach clinically relevant effect sizes. Small sample sizes, inadequate use of headache classification, and other methodological shortcomings reduce the confidence in these results. Methodologically sound, randomized controlled trials with adequate sample sizes are required to provide information on whether and which physiotherapy approach is effective. According to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), the current level of evidence is low.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Manual therapies for cervicogenic headache: a systematic reviewThe Journal of Headache and Pain, 2012
- The Role of Tissue Damage in Whiplash-Associated DisordersSpine, 2011
- Clinical outcome of a headache-specific multidisciplinary treatment program and adherence to treatment recommendations in a tertiary headache center: an observational studyThe Journal of Headache and Pain, 2011
- Effectiveness of an educational and physical program in reducing accompanying symptoms in subjects with head and neck pain: a workplace controlled trialThe Journal of Headache and Pain, 2011
- Further evidence of the positive effects of an educational and physical program on headache, neck and shoulder pain in a working communityThe Journal of Headache and Pain, 2010
- Outcome measures in chronic low back painEuropean Spine Journal, 2010
- Dose response and efficacy of spinal manipulation for chronic cervicogenic headache: a pilot randomized controlled trialThe Spine Journal, 2010
- How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2008
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back PainSpine, 2008