In Vitro Analysis of Quality of Dental Adhesive Bond Systems Applied in Various Conditions
Open Access
- 16 September 2020
- Vol. 10 (9), 891
- https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090891
Abstract
Introduction: There are several methods of reducing a microleakage, and one of them is choosing appropriate adhesive material. The aim of the work was the in vitro analysis of 4 bonds: 3M ESPE “Single bond”, Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active”, Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal”, and Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”. Material and methods: 136 healthy molar teeth were collected and randomly split into 4 groups and Vth Class cavities were prepared. Chosen adhesives were used in four groups of teeth with the same composite. Teeth were the thermocycled, sealed, covered with lacquer, and submerged in 1% methylene blue solution for 24 h. After the thermocycling, the vertices of each tooth were sealed using dental wax. Each tooth was then fully covered with lacquer. All teeth were then submerged into 1% methylene blue solution for 24 h in room temperature. In the next step they were transversely cut through a center of restoration. The Olympus BX43 microscope was used to photograph each cut tooth. With the usage of Olympus stream software, measurement of the dye’s leakage was performed. Results. The statistical analysis proved that the most effective material when applied to ideally prepared cavity surface was Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active”. The second material was 3M ESPE “Single Bond”, third—Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal” and fourth—Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”. The most effective material applied to a too-dry surface was Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active”, second—3M ESPE “Single Bond”, third—Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal” and fourth—Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”. When it comes to too damp surfaces the best results were obtained with Dentsply “Prime and Bond Active” then Coltene “One Coat 7 Universal”, 3M ESPE “Single Bond” and Kuraray “Clearfil Universal Bond Quick”. Conclusion: The level of cavity dampness influences the quality of adhesives. Better results are obtained with over-dried surfaces than over-damp, which is connected with the dilution of the material.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Leakage testing for different adhesive systems and composites to permanent teethNigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 2017
- Microleakage of Self-Etch Adhesive System in Class V Cavities Prepared by Using Er:YAG Laser with Different Pulse ModesPhotomedicine and Laser Surgery, 2015
- Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine – Old wine in new bottles?Journal of Dentistry, 2015
- Accuracy and reproducibility of probe forces during simulated periodontal pocket depth measurementsThe Saudi Dental Journal, 2014
- Evaluation of the microleakage of different class V cavities prepared by using Er:YAG laser, ultrasonic device, and conventional rotary instruments with two dentin bonding systems (an in vitro study)Lasers in Medical Science, 2014
- Guidelines for Reporting Pre-clinical In Vitro Studies on Dental MaterialsJournal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, 2012
- Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorationsClinical Oral Investigations, 2012
- Coatings in Dentistry—A Review of Some Basic PrinciplesCoatings, 2012
- Shear bond strength and quantitative microleakage of a multipurpose dental adhesive system resin bonded to dentinThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1995
- Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesivesDental Materials, 1994