A Sense of Danger from Radiation1
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Radiation Research Society in Radiation Research
- Vol. 162 (1), 1-19
- https://doi.org/10.1667/rr3196
Abstract
McBride, W. H., Chiang, C-S., Olson, J. L., Wang, C-C., Hong, J-H., Pajonk, F., Dougherty, G. J., Iwamoto, K. S., Pervan, M. and Liao, Y-P. A Sense of Danger from Radiation. Radiat. Res. 162, 1–19 (2004).Tissue damage caused by exposure to pathogens, chemicals and physical agents such as ionizing radiation triggers production of generic “danger” signals that mobilize the innate and acquired immune system to deal with the intrusion and effect tissue repair with the goal of maintaining the integrity of the tissue and the body. Ionizing radiation appears to do the same, but less is known about the role of “danger” signals in tissue responses to this agent. This review deals with the nature of putative “danger” signals that may be generated by exposure to ionizing radiation and their significance. There are a number of potential consequences of “danger” signaling in response to radiation exposure. “Danger” signals could mediate the pathogenesis of, or recovery from, radiation damage. They could alter intrinsic cellular radiosensitivity or initiate radioadaptive responses to subsequent exposure. They may spread outside the locally damaged site and mediate bystander or “out-of-field” radiation effects. Finally, an important aspect of classical “danger” signals is that they link initial nonspecific immune responses in a pathological site to the development of specific adaptive immunity. Interestingly, in the case of radiation, there is little evidence that “danger” signals efficiently translate radiation-induced tumor cell death into the generation of tumor-specific immunity or normal tissue damage into autoimmunity. The suggestion is that radiation-induced “danger” signals may be inadequate in this respect or that radiation interferes with the generation of specific immunity. There are many issues that need to be resolved regarding “danger” signaling after exposure to ionizing radiation. Evidence of their importance is, in some areas, scant, but the issues are worthy of consideration, if for no other reason than that manipulation of these pathways has the potential to improve the therapeutic benefit of radiation therapy. This article focuses on how normal tissues and tumors sense and respond to danger from ionizing radiation, on the nature of the signals that are sent, and on the impact on the eventual consequences of exposure.Keywords
This publication has 99 references indexed in Scilit:
- Molecular identification of a danger signal that alerts the immune system to dying cellsNature, 2003
- Restoring Apoptosis in Pancreatic Cancer Cells by Targeting the Nuclear Factor-κB Signaling Pathway With the Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Antibody IMC-C225Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2003
- The radioprotective effect of the 24 kDa FGF-2 isoform in HeLa cells is related to an increased expression and activity of the DNA dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) catalytic subunitOncogene, 2002
- Do inflammatory processes contribute to radiation induced erythema observed in the skin of humans?Radiotherapy and Oncology, 1998
- Erythema: Goodbye LQ!Radiotherapy and Oncology, 1997
- Prognostic factors for acute and late skin reactions in radiotheraphy patientsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1996
- Three paths to stress reliefNature, 1996
- E-Selectin Gene Induction by Ionizing Radiation Is Independent of Cytokine InductionBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1995
- Interleukin 6 mediated differentiation and rescue of cell redox in PC 12 cells exposed to ionizing radiationFEBS Letters, 1995
- Modulation of fibrinolysis by ionizing radiationJournal of Neuro-Oncology, 1994