Safety Considerations and Fluid Resuscitation in Liposuction: An Analysis of 53 Consecutive Patients
Open Access
- 1 November 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 102 (6), 2220-2229
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199811000-00063
Abstract
There is no agreement as to appropriate fluid resuscitation in patients undergoing liposuction. This has assumed greater significance, as surgeons have undertaken larger volume aspirations (≥ 4 liters) and the potential complications of hypovolemia and fluid overload have materialized. This prospective study of 53 consecutive healthy patients undergoing liposuction using a superwet technique served to develop general guidelines for safe perioperative fluid management, especially in regard to large-volume aspirations. In this context, “aspirate” is defined as the total fat and fluid that is removed during liposuction. All patients were monitored using standard noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring. Thirty-six patients were monitored perioperatively with Foley catheters. The 53 patients underwent liposuction alone. We did not include patients who underwent concurrent aesthetic surgical procedures because our intention was to establish fluid administration guidelines for the liposuction patient. There were no significant complications in our series. The intraoperative fluid ratio, defined as (intravenous fluid + infiltrate)/aspirate, was 2.1 for the small-volume group and 1.4 for the large-volume group. These values were significantly different (pt Our suggested guidelines for fluid resuscitation based on this retrospective study are as follows: (1) small volume (This formula has since been used in the care of 94 patients who have undergone liposuction exclusively. All patients have had unremarkable hospital courses. These guidelines do not replace sound clinical judgment. Good communication between the surgeon and anesthesiologist is critical to optimal patient care and safety. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 102: 2220, 1998.) This formula has since been used in the care of 94 patients who have undergone liposuction exclusively. All patients have had unremarkable hospital courses. These guidelines do not replace sound clinical judgment. Good communication between the surgeon and anesthesiologist is critical to optimal patient care and safety. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 102: 2220, 1998.)Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complications of the Tumescent Formula For LiposuctionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1997
- Factors contributing to adverse effects of the tumescent technique.Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 1997
- Tumescent Liposuction Complicated by Pulmonary EdemaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1997
- Blood loss during liposuction using the tumescent techniqueAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 1994
- Tumescent Technique for Local Anesthesia Improves Safety in Large-Volume LiposuctionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1993
- Large-Volume Suction LipectomyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1992
- Tumescent Technique for Regional Anesthesia Permits Lidocaine Doses of 35 mg/kg for LiposuctionThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1990
- Large Volume LipoplastyClinics in Plastic Surgery, 1989
- Determining Safe Limits for Untransfused, Outpatient Liposuction: Personal Experience and Review of the LiteratureThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1988
- Liposuction Surgery Under Local Anesthesia: Limited Blood Loss and Minimal Lidocaine AbsorptionThe Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1988