Understanding and Integrating Local Perceptions of Trees and Forests into Incentives for Sustainable Landscape Management
Open Access
- 5 June 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Environmental Management
- Vol. 48 (2), 334-349
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9689-1
Abstract
We examine five forested landscapes in Africa (Cameroon, Madagascar, and Tanzania) and Asia (Indonesia and Laos) at different stages of landscape change. In all five areas, forest cover (outside of protected areas) continues to decrease despite local people’s recognition of the importance of forest products and services. After forest conversion, agroforestry systems and fallows provide multiple functions and valued products, and retain significant biodiversity. But there are indications that such land use is transitory, with gradual simplification and loss of complex agroforests and fallows as land use becomes increasingly individualistic and profit driven. In Indonesia and Tanzania, farmers favor monocultures (rubber and oil palm, and sugarcane, respectively) for their high financial returns, with these systems replacing existing complex agroforests. In the study sites in Madagascar and Laos, investments in agroforests and new crops remain rare, despite government attempts to eradicate swidden systems and their multifunctional fallows. We discuss approaches to assessing local values related to landscape cover and associated goods and services. We highlight discrepancies between individual and collective responses in characterizing land use tendencies, and discuss the effects of accessibility on land management. We conclude that a combination of social, economic, and spatially explicit assessment methods is necessary to inform land use planning. Furthermore, any efforts to modify current trends will require clear incentives, such as through carbon finance. We speculate on the nature of such incentive schemes and the possibility of rewarding the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale and in a socially equitable manner.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protected areas reduced poverty in Costa Rica and ThailandProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes: Challenges and Opportunities of Coffee Agroforests in the Western Ghats, IndiaConservation Biology, 2010
- What is “forest?” Response to Guariguata et al.Conservation Letters, 2009
- Landscape labelling: A concept for next-generation payment for ecosystem service schemesForest Ecology and Management, 2009
- Payments for Ecosystem Services: A New Way of Conserving Biodiversity in ForestsJournal of Sustainable Forestry, 2009
- Drivers of reforestation in human-dominated forestsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Biodiversity conservation in cocoa production landscapes: an overviewBiodiversity and Conservation, 2007
- Enhancing Farm Tree Diversity as a Means of Conserving Landscape-based BiodiversityMountain Research and Development, 2005
- Self‐Determination or Environmental Determinism for Indigenous Peoples in Tropical Forest ConservationConservation Biology, 2000
- Conservation-with-Development: An Application of the Concept in the Usambara Mountains, TanzaniaTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1992