CFHTLenS and RCSLenS: testing photometric redshift distributions using angular cross-correlations with spectroscopic galaxy surveys
- 8 September 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Vol. 463 (4), 3737-3754
- https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2241
Abstract
We determine the accuracy of galaxy redshift distributions as estimated from photometric redshift probability distributions p(z). Our method utilizes measurements of the angular cross-correlation between photometric galaxies and an overlapping sample of galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts. We describe the redshift leakage from a galaxy photometric redshift bin j into a spectroscopic redshift bin i using the sum of the p(z) for the galaxies residing in bin j. We can then predict the angular cross-correlation between photometric and spectroscopic galaxies due to intrinsic galaxy clustering when i ≠ j as a function of the measured angular cross-correlation when i = j. We also account for enhanced clustering arising from lensing magnification using a halo model. The comparison of this prediction with the measured signal provides a consistency check on the validity of using the summed p(z) to determine galaxy redshift distributions in cosmological analyses, as advocated by the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS). We present an analysis of the photometric redshifts measured by CFHTLenS, which overlaps the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). We also analyse the Red-sequence Cluster Lensing Survey, which overlaps both BOSS and the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey. We find that the summed p(z) from both surveys are generally biased with respect to the true underlying distributions. If unaccounted for, this bias would lead to errors in cosmological parameter estimation from CFHTLenS by less than ∼4 per cent. For photometric redshift bins which spatially overlap in 3D with our spectroscopic sample, we determine redshift bias corrections which can be used in future cosmological analyses that rely on accurate galaxy redshift distributions.This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Releases 10 and 11 Galaxy samplesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2014
- THE TENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY: FIRST SPECTROSCOPIC DATA FROM THE SDSS-III APACHE POINT OBSERVATORY GALACTIC EVOLUTION EXPERIMENTThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2014
- Weighing the Giants – III. Methods and measurements of accurate galaxy cluster weak-lensing massesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2014
- CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing: quantifying accurate redshift distributionsMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2013
- CHARACTERIZING AND PROPAGATING MODELING UNCERTAINTIES IN PHOTOMETRICALLY DERIVED REDSHIFT DISTRIBUTIONSThe Astrophysical Journal, 2011
- Photometric redshifts: estimating their contamination and distribution using clustering informationMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2010
- The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the selection function and z= 0.6 galaxy power spectrumMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2010
- Catastrophic photometric redshift errors: weak-lensing survey requirementsMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2010
- Bayesian Photometric Redshift EstimationThe Astrophysical Journal, 2000
- SExtractor: Software for source extractionAstronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 1996