Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 108 (10), 1378-1384
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2018.304567
Abstract
Objectives. To understand how Twitter bots and trolls (“bots”) promote online health content. Methods. We compared bots’ to average users’ rates of vaccine-relevant messages, which we collected online from July 2014 through September 2017. We estimated the likelihood that users were bots, comparing proportions of polarized and antivaccine tweets across user types. We conducted a content analysis of a Twitter hashtag associated with Russian troll activity. Results. Compared with average users, Russian trolls (χ2(1) = 102.0; P < .001), sophisticated bots (χ2(1) = 28.6; P < .001), and “content polluters” (χ2(1) = 7.0; P < .001) tweeted about vaccination at higher rates. Whereas content polluters posted more antivaccine content (χ2(1) = 11.18; P < .001), Russian trolls amplified both sides. Unidentifiable accounts were more polarized (χ2(1) = 12.1; P < .001) and antivaccine (χ2(1) = 35.9; P < .001). Analysis of the Russian troll hashtag showed that its messages were more political and divisive. Conclusions. Whereas bots that spread malware and unsolicited content disseminated antivaccine messages, Russian trolls promoted discord. Accounts masquerading as legitimate users create false equivalency, eroding public consensus on vaccination. Public Health Implications. Directly confronting vaccine skeptics enables bots to legitimize the vaccine debate. More research is needed to determine how best to combat bot-driven content.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implicationsExpert Review of Vaccines, 2014
- The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination IntentionsPLOS ONE, 2014
- The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentionsHealth Education Research, 2012
- Parents’ Source of Vaccine Information and Impact on Vaccine Attitudes, Beliefs, and Nonmedical ExemptionsAdvances in Preventive Medicine, 2012
- Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisionsVaccine, 2012
- Social Media and Suicide: A Public Health PerspectiveAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2012
- The defining characteristics of Web 2.0 and their potential influence in the online vaccination debateVaccine, 2012
- Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movementVaccine, 2012
- Navigating Parental Vaccine HesitancyPediatric Annals, 2010
- A postmodern Pandora's box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the InternetVaccine, 2010