Does it Pay to Be Good...And Does it Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance
Preprint
- 1 March 2009
- preprint
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
In an era of rising concern about financial performance and social ills, companies’ economic achievements and negative externalities prompt a common question: Does it pay to be good? For thirty-five years, researchers have been investigating the empirical link between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP). In the most comprehensive review of this research to date, we conduct a meta-analysis of 251 studies presented in 214 manuscripts. The overall effect is positive but small (mean r = .13, median r = .09, weighted r = .11), and results for the 106 studies from the past decade are even smaller. We also conduct sensitivity analyses to determine whether or not the relationship is stronger under certain conditions. Except for the effect of revealed misdeeds on financial performance, none of the many contingencies examined in the literature markedly affects the results. Therefore, we conclude by considering whether, aside from striving to do no harm, companies have grounds for doing good - and whether researchers have grounds for continuing to look for an empirical link between CSP and CFP.Keywords
This publication has 101 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Socially Responsible Investing: A Global PerspectiveJournal of Business Ethics, 2006
- Components of CEO Transformational Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility*Journal of Management Studies, 2006
- Challenges of the “green imperative”: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationshipJournal of Business Research, 2005
- Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigationTransportation Research. Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 2000
- Correlates of organizational effectiveness: A multilevel analysis of a multidimensional outcomeJournal of Business Ethics, 1994
- An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performanceAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1993
- Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theoryAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1992
- Differences in Social‐Cost Disclosures: A Market Test of Investor ReactionsAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1991
- Stakeholder management and corporate performanceJournal of Behavioral Economics, 1991
- The market reaction to social responsibility disclosures: The case of the Sullivan principles signingsAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1990