Reconsidering the Criteria for Evaluating Proposed Screening Programs: Reflections From 4 Current and Former Members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Open Access
- 10 June 2011
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Epidemiologic Reviews
- Vol. 33 (1), 20-35
- https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxr005
Abstract
In 1968, Wilson and Jungner published 10 “principles” for evaluating screening programs (Public Health Papers No. 34. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization), criteria widely used since then. The 4 authors of this review (all current or former members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force) have found a different paradigm more useful for evaluating screening programs. This review was written independently of the USPSTF; the authors speak only for themselves and not for the USPSTF. They suggest evaluating screening programs not as a checklist but as a balance between the magnitude of benefits and the magnitude of harms, each estimated from a systematic review of the evidence. To emphasize a focus on health outcomes, the authors suggest reframing the target of screening as an umbrella concept: the “predictor of poor health.” Evaluation groups should weigh health benefits and harms to estimate net benefits and then consider whether these net benefits justify the resources required. The final decision about implementation should be made by a democratic process that considers both the panel's evaluation of the evidence and nonevidence factors (e.g., resources available, other priorities, the informed population's preferences). The authors hope these suggestions stimulate further discussion about the optimal way to evaluate proposed screening programs.This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Update on the Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Insufficient EvidenceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2009
- Revisting wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 yearsBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2008
- Update on the Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Estimating Certainty and Magnitude of Net BenefitAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2007
- Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of PhysiciansAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2007
- Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Best-Evidence Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2005
- Screening for Ovarian Cancer: Recommendation StatementAnnals of Family Medicine, 2004
- Screening Adults for Type 2 Diabetes: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the processAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2001
- Projecting Individualized Probabilities of Developing Breast Cancer for White Females Who Are Being Examined AnnuallyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1989
- Multiphasic Health Checkup Evaluation: A 16-year follow-upJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986