An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice
- 8 February 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Journal of Human Genetics
- Vol. 20 (8), 825-830
- https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.13
Abstract
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) allows individuals to obtain genetic tests directly from companies without necessarily involving health professionals. This study explores genetic health professionals' opinions of health-related DTC-GT and the reported frequency of individuals presenting to clinical genetics services after undertaking testing. Genetic counsellors and clinical geneticists, members of the Human Genetics Society of Australasia, completed an online survey in mid 2011. The 130 genetic counsellors (estimated response fraction=43%) and 38 clinical geneticists (estimated response fraction=46%) had mixed opinions regarding DTC-GT, with only 7% confident in accurately interpreting and explaining DTC-GT results. Nineteen respondents (11%) reported one or more client(s) referred to them after undertaking DTC-GT. Descriptions of 25 clients were extracted from responses, and respondents reported that all clients were concerned for the health of either themselves or family members. Most clients presented to genetic clinics specifically as a result of their DTC-GT (96%) and were self or GP referred (92%). Respondents perceived that their clients typically undertook DTC-GT because they wanted to identify monogenic conditions, including carrier testing and/or know their susceptibility or predisposition for complex conditions (88%). The majority of clients needed help interpreting DTC-GT results (80%), however in general were not questioning the validity of their DTC-GT results (92%) nor seeking further genetic testing (84%). Currently, DTC-GT is not a major reason for referral to clinical genetics services in Australia and New Zealand and the majority of genetic health professionals lack confidence in being able to accurately interpret and explain DTC-GT results.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are the kids really all right? Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in children: are company policies clashing with professional norms?European Journal of Human Genetics, 2011
- Self Diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome Using Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing: A Case StudyJournal of Genetic Counseling, 2011
- Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Genomewide Profiling to Assess Disease RiskNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Genetic Tests: Access Does Not Reflect Clinical UtilityGenetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 2010
- Clinical assessment incorporating a personal genomeThe Lancet, 2010
- An epidemiological perspective on the future of direct-to-consumer personal genome testingInvestigative Genetics, 2010
- Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a review of companies’ policies with regard to genetic testing in minorsFamilial Cancer, 2009
- Direct-to-Consumer Genomics, Social Networking, and ConfidentialityAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2009
- Direct-to-Consumer Genomics and Research Ethics: Should a More Robust Informed Consent Process Be Included?American Journal of Bioethics, 2009
- Evaluating Online Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Genetic Tests: Informed Choices or Buyers Beware?Genetic Testing, 2008