Correspondence: Litigation related to regional anaesthesia: careful reading and interpretation needed
- 27 August 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 65 (9), 958-959
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06469.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The hidden cost of neuraxial anaesthesia?Anaesthesia, 2010
- Litigation related to regional anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995–2007*Anaesthesia, 2010
- Litigation related to anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995–2007Anaesthesia, 2009
- Is the outcome for central neuraxial blockade really reassuring?British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2009
- Who might benefit from, or be harmed by, epidural anaesthesia and analgesia?Anaesthesia, 2009
- Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of AnaesthetistsBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2009
- Epidural anaesthesia and survival after intermediate-to-high risk non-cardiac surgery: a population-based cohort studyThe Lancet, 2008
- A Review of Neuraxial Epidural MorbidityAnesthesiology, 2007
- Major complications of epidural analgesia after surgery: results of a six‐year surveyAnaesthesia, 2007