Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis
Open Access
- 22 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 29 (8), 1043-1048
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm543
Abstract
The present study tests the consistency of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Current guidelines/recommendations define severe stenosis as an aortic valve area (AVA) 2 (or 40 mmHg, or peak flow velocity (Vmax) >4 m/s. We tested the consistency of the three criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis in 3483 echocardiography studies performed in 2427 patients with normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function and a calculated AVA of ≤2 cm2. We calculated curve fits for the relationship between AVA and ΔPm using the Gorlin equation and between AVA and Vmax based on the continuity equation for our study population. An AVA of 1.0 cm2 correlated to a ΔPm of 21 mmHg and a Vmax of 3.3 m/s. Conversely, a ΔPm of 40 mmHg corresponds to an AVA of 0.75 cm2 and a Vmax of 4.0 m/s to an AVA of 0.82 cm2. Consequently, severe stenosis was diagnosed in 69% of patients based on AVA, 45% on Vmax, and 40% on ΔPm. Stroke volume was lower in inconsistently graded patients (65 ± 11 mL vs. consistently graded: 70 ± 14 mL, P < 0.001). The criteria for the grading of aortic stenosis are inconsistent in patients with normal systolic LV function. On the basis of AVA, a higher proportion of patients is classified as having severe aortic valve stenosis compared with mean pressure gradient and peak flow velocity. Discrepant grading in these patients may be partly due to reduced stroke volume.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Higher Afterload and Reduced SurvivalCirculation, 2007
- ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart DiseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Valvular Aortic StenosisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Outcome of 622 Adults With Asymptomatic, Hemodynamically Significant Aortic Stenosis During Prolonged Follow-UpCirculation, 2005
- Aortic StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Predictors of Outcome in Severe, Asymptomatic Aortic StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- The natural history of adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival.Cell Metabolism, 1982
- The natural history of aortic stenosis in adultsAmerican Heart Journal, 1980
- Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. IAmerican Heart Journal, 1951