"I'd Know a False Confession if I Saw One": A Comparative Study of College Students and Police Investigators.
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 29 (2), 211-227
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-2416-9
Abstract
College students and police investigators watched or listened to 10 prison inmates confessing to crimes. Half the confessions were true accounts; half were false--concocted for the study. Consistent with much recent research, students were generally more accurate than police, and accuracy rates were higher among those presented with audiotaped than videotaped confessions. In addition, investigators were significantly more confident in their judgments and also prone to judge confessors guilty. To determine if police accuracy would increase if this guilty response bias were neutralized, participants in a second experiment were specifically informed that half the confessions were true and half were false. This manipulation eliminated the investigator response bias, but it did not increase accuracy or lower confidence. These findings are discussed for what they imply about the post-interrogation risks to innocent suspects who confess.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Generalized Communicative Suspicion (GCS) Among Police Officers: Accounting for the Investigator Bias Effect1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2005
- Detecting True Lies: Police Officers' Ability to Detect Suspects' Lies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004
- Videotaped interrogations and confessions: A simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002
- "I'm innocent!": Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room.Law and Human Behavior, 1999
- The Consequences of False Confessions: Deprivations of Liberty and Miscarriages of Justice in the Age of Psychological InterrogationThe Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1998
- Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the "harmless error" rule.Law and Human Behavior, 1997
- Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectorsCommunication Monographs, 1991
- Who can catch a liar?American Psychologist, 1991
- Learning to detect deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984
- Attentional Determinants of Success at Detecting Deception and TruthPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982