On predictors of misconceptions about educational topics: A case of topic specificity
Open Access
- 1 December 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 16 (12), e0259878
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259878
Abstract
A large variety of misconceptions about learning, teaching, and other educational topics is prevalent in the public but also among educational professionals. Such misconceptions may lead to ill-advised judgments and actions in private life, professional practice, and policymaking. Developing effective correction strategies for these misconceptions hinges on a better understanding of the factors that make individuals susceptible to or resilient against misconceptions. The present study surveyed students from educational and non-educational fields of study to investigate whether the endorsement of four typical educational misconceptions can be predicted by study-related variables (i.e., field of study and study progress) and by students’ cognitive ability (i.e., numeracy), epistemic orientations, general world views (i.e., conservative orientation), and education-related values (i.e., educational goals). A sample of N = 315 undergraduates in teacher education and education- and non-education-related fields of study completed an online survey. Results from structural equation models showed that the pattern of effects strongly varied across the specific misconceptions. The two misconceptions related to teaching factors (i.e., class size and effectiveness of direct instruction as a teaching method) were the most strongly affected by the field of study and had an association with conservative orientation. In contrast, the misconception about the effectiveness of grade retention as an educational intervention was more prevalent among the students emphasizing conventional educational goals, such as discipline. None of the investigated explanatory variables proved predictive of the misconception about the “feminization” of education as an educational-equity topic. Moreover, neither numeracy nor epistemic orientation was found to have any effect on the endorsement of educational misconceptions. These findings emphasize the topic dependency of the factors that make individuals susceptible to misconceptions. Future research and intervention approaches need to consider the topic specificity of educational misconceptions.Funding Information
- University of Erfurt, Faculty of Education
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Misconceptions about Psychological Science: A ReviewPsychology Learning & Teaching, 2013
- Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models?BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2012
- Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among TeachersFrontiers in Psychology, 2012
- The Scientific Impotence Excuse: Discounting Belief‐Threatening Scientific AbstractsJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 2010
- Quality of Research Design Moderates Effects of Grade Retention on Achievement: A Meta-Analytic, Multilevel AnalysisEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2009
- Paranormal belief and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacyApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2008
- Neuroscience and education: from research to practice?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2006
- Toward a Political Explanation of Grade RetentionEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2005
- Adults' Statistical Literacy: Meanings, Components, ResponsibilitiesInternational Statistical Review, 2002
- Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy ConstructReview of Educational Research, 1992