Evaluation of an automated knowledge based treatment planning system for head and neck
Open Access
- 10 November 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Radiation Oncology
- Vol. 10 (1), 226
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0533-2
Abstract
This study evaluated an automated inverse treatment planning algorithm, Pinnacle Auto-Planning (AP), and compared automatically generated plans with historical plans in a large cohort of head and neck cancer patients. Fifty consecutive patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (Eclipse, Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA) for head and neck were re-planned with AP version 9.10. Only one single cycle of plan optimization using one single template was allowed for AP. The dose to the planning target volumes (PTV’s; 3–4 dose levels), the organs at risk (OAR’s) and the effective working time for planning was evaluated. Additionally, two experienced radiation oncologists blind-reviewed and ranked 10 plans. Dose coverage and dose homogeneity of the PTV were significantly improved with AP, however manually optimized plans showed significantly improved dose conformity. The mean dose to the parotid glands, oral mucosa, swallowing muscles, dorsal neck tissue and maximal dose to the spinal cord were significantly reduced with AP. In 64 % of the plans, the mean dose to any OAR (spinal cord excluded) was reduced by >20 % with AP in comparison to the manually optimized plans. In 12 % of the plans, the manually optimized plans showed reduced doses by >20 % in at least one OAR. The experienced radiation oncologists preferred the AP plan and the clinical plan in 80 and 20 % of the cases, respectively. The average effective working time was 3.8 min ± 1.1 min in comparison to 48.5 min ± 6.0 min using AP compared to the manually optimized plans, respectively. The evaluated automated planning algorithm achieved highly consistent and significantly improved treatment plans with potentially clinically relevant OAR sparing by >20 % in 64 % of the cases. The effective working time was substantially reduced with Auto-Planning.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Knowledge-based radiation therapy (KBRT) treatment planning versus planning by experts: validation of a KBRT algorithm for prostate cancer treatment planningRadiation Oncology, 2015
- Automation and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Individualized High-Quality Tangent Breast Treatment PlansInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2014
- Assessment of a model based optimization engine for volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular cancerRadiation Oncology, 2014
- Real-time interactive treatment planningPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2014
- Dysphagia after definitive radiotherapy for head and neck cancerStrahlentherapie Und Onkologie, 2013
- Data-Driven Approach to Generating Achievable Dose–Volume Histogram Objectives in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy PlanningInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2011
- Dysphagia disorders in patients with cancer of the oropharynx are significantly affected by the radiation therapy dose to the superior and middle constrictor muscle: A dose-effect relationshipRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2007
- Evaluation of Parotid Gland Function following Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck CancerCancer Research and Treatment, 2006
- A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plansJournal of Neurosurgery, 2000
- Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1999