Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database
- 1 September 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Spine Journal
- Vol. 14 (9), 2019-2027
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.050
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost analysis of anterior-posterior circumferential fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionThe Spine Journal, 2013
- Complications Associated With Posterior and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody FusionJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2012
- Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality After Anterior, Posterior, and Anterior/Posterior Spine Fusion SurgerySpine, 2011
- The role of the vascular surgeon in anterior retroperitoneal spine exposure: Preservation of open surgical trainingJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2009
- Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusionThe Spine Journal, 2006
- Comparison of Posterior and Transforaminal Approaches to Lumbar Interbody FusionSpine, 2001
- The Bagby and Kuslich Method of Lumbar Interbody FusionSpine, 1998
- Interbody, Posterior, and Combined Lumbar FusionsSpine, 1995
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Die operative Behandlung der Spondylolisthese durch dorsale Aufrichtung und ventrale VerblockungZeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Ihre Grenzgebiete, 1982