Comparison of arterial spin labeling and first‐pass dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR imaging in the assessment of pulmonary perfusion in humans: The inflow spin‐tracer saturation effect
Open Access
- 23 November 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 52 (6), 1291-1301
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20301
Abstract
The flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) and the first‐pass dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR imaging (CE‐MRI) techniques have both been shown to be effective in the assessment of human pulmonary perfusion. However, no comprehensive comparison of the measurements by these two methods has been reported. In this study, healthy adults were recruited, with FAIR and CE‐MRI performed for an estimation of the relative pulmonary blood flow (rPBF). Regions of interest were encircled from the right and left lungs, with right‐to‐left rPBF ratios calculated. Results indicated that, on posterior coronal slices, the rPBF ratios obtained with the FAIR technique agreed well with CE‐MRI measurements (mean difference = −0.02, intraclass correlation coefficient RI = 0.78, 95% confidence interval = [0.67, 0.86]). On middle coronal slices, however, FAIR showed a substantially lower rPBF by up to 43% in the right lung compared with CE‐MRI (mean difference = −0.38, RI = 0.34, 95% confidence interval = [−0.09, 0.68]). The location‐dependent discrepancy between measurements by FAIR and CE‐MRI methods is attributed to tracer saturation effects of arterial inflow when the middle coronal slice contains the in‐plane‐oriented right pulmonary artery, whereas the left lung rPBF is less affected due to oblique orientation of the left pulmonary artery. Intrasequence comparison on additional subjects using FAIR at different slice orientations supported the above hypothesis. It is concluded that FAIR imaging for pulmonary perfusion in the coronal plane provides equivalent rPBF information with CE‐MRI only in the absence of tracer saturation effects; hence, FAIR should be carefully exercised to avoid misleading interpretations. Magn Reson Med 52:1291–1301, 2004.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Pulmonary Perfusion With Ultrafast Projection Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison With Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy in Patients With Malignant StenosisInvestigative Radiology, 2002
- Ventilation‐perfusion ratio of signal intensity in human lung using oxygen‐enhanced and arterial spin labeling techniquesMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2002
- Perfusion abnormalities in pulmonary embolism studied with perfusion MRI and ventilation‐perfusion scintigraphy: An intra‐modality and inter‐modality agreement studyJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2002
- Quantification of pulmonary perfusion with MR imaging: recent advancesEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2001
- Pulmonary Perfusion: Respiratory-triggered Three-dimensional MR Imaging with Arterial Spin Tagging—Preliminary Results in Healthy VolunteersRadiology, 1999
- MR perfusion imaging of pulmonary parenchyma using pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques: FAIRER and FAIRJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1999
- Prospective comparison of MR lung perfusion and lung scintigraphyJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1999
- Pulmonary embolism: detection with MR perfusion imaging of lung--a feasibility study.Radiology, 1997
- Pulmonary perfusion: Qualitative assessment with dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI using ultra‐short TE and inversion recovery turbo FLASHMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996
- Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: Application to functional mappingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1995