The risk of re-identification versus the need to identify individuals in rare disease research
Open Access
- 25 May 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Journal of Human Genetics
- Vol. 24 (11), 1553-1558
- https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.52
Abstract
There is a growing concern in the ethics literature and among policy makers that de-identification or coding of personal data and biospecimens is not sufficient for protecting research subjects from privacy invasions and possible breaches of confidentiality due to the possibility of unauthorized re-identification. At the same time, there is a need in medical science to be able to identify individual patients. In particular for rare disease research there is a special and well-documented need for research collaboration so that data and biosamples from multiple independent studies can be shared across borders. In this article, we identify the needs and arguments related to de-identification and re-identification of patients and research subjects and suggest how the different needs may be balanced within a framework of using unique encrypted identifiers.This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname InferenceScience, 2013
- Use of electronic patient records for research: views of patients and staff in general practiceFamily Practice, 2012
- The Tension Between Data Sharing and the Protection of Privacy in Genomics ResearchAnnual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2012
- Genomics really gets personal: How exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics researchAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2011
- Identifiability in biobanks: models, measures, and mitigation strategiesHuman Genetics, 2011
- Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners' records: a survey of the Irish general publicJournal of Medical Ethics, 2010
- Using global unique identifiers to link autism collectionsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2010
- Is Deidentification Sufficient to Protect Health Privacy in Research?American Journal of Bioethics, 2010
- Consent for use of personal information for health research: Do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions?BMC Medical Ethics, 2009
- National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer RegistryBMJ, 2006