Comparison of Hollow Fiber and Single-Drop Liquid-Phase Microextraction Techniques for HPLC Determination of Aniline Derivatives in Water
- 19 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Chromatographia
- Vol. 63 (11-12), 563-569
- https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-006-0801-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antibiotic-assisted three-phase liquid-phase microextraction of aromatic amines from aqueous solutions combined with high-performance liquid chromatographyJournal of Analytical Chemistry, 2006
- LC Determination of Mono-Substituted Phenols in Water Using Liquid–Liquid–Liquid Phase MicroextractionChromatographia, 2005
- Liquid–liquid–liquid phase microextraction of aromatic amines in water using crown ethers by high-performance liquid chromatography with monolithic columnTalanta, 2005
- Determination of drug–protein binding using supported liquid membrane extraction under equilibrium conditionsJournal of Chromatography B, 2005
- Monolithic columns for high-efficiency HPLC separationsCurrent Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2004
- Developments in hollow fibre-based, liquid-phase microextractionTrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2004
- Development of a hollow fibre liquid phase microextraction method to monitor the sonochemical degradation of explosives in waterAnalytica Chimica Acta, 2004
- Developments in liquid-phase microextractionTrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2003
- Incomplete Trapping in Supported Liquid Membrane Extraction with a Stagnant Acceptor for Weak BasesAnalytical Chemistry, 1998
- Mass transfer kinetics for analytical enrichment and sample preparation using supported liquid membranes in a flow system with stagnant acceptor liquidAnalytica Chimica Acta, 1993