INTERRATER CORRELATIONS DO NOT ESTIMATE THE RELIABILITY OF JOB PERFORMANCE RATINGS
- 7 December 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Personnel Psychology
- Vol. 53 (4), 873-900
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb02421.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE EFFECTS OF PERCEIVED SYSTEM KNOWLEDGE ON THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SELF-RATINGS AND SUPERVISOR RATINGSPersonnel Psychology, 2006
- Understanding Method Variance in Multitrait-Multirater Performance Appraisal Matrices: Examples Using General Impressions and Interpersonal Affect as Measured Method FactorsHuman Performance, 1998
- Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios.Psychological Methods, 1996
- Performance Appraisal Process Research in the 1980s: What Has It Contributed to Appraisals in Use?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993
- Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989
- The vertical dyad linkage model of leadership: Problems and prospectsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984
- Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- Polarized appraisals of out-group members.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizationsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975