Impact of biased and randomly corrupted inputs on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models
- 30 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Hydrology
- Vol. 320 (1-2), 62-83
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.016
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall-runoff model?: Part 1—Can rainfall-runoff models effectively handle detailed potential evapotranspiration inputs?Journal of Hydrology, 2005
- Impact of imperfect potential evapotranspiration knowledge on the efficiency and parameters of watershed modelsJournal of Hydrology, 2004
- Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulationJournal of Hydrology, 2003
- Impact of imperfect rainfall knowledge on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed modelsJournal of Hydrology, 2001
- Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchmentsJournal of Hydrology, 2001
- GR3J: a daily watershed model with three free parametersHydrological Sciences Journal, 1999
- Uncertainty in rainfall—runoff model simulations and the implications for predicting the hydrologic effects of land-use changeJournal of Hydrology, 1997
- Sensitivity of monthly rainfall-runoff models to input errors and data lengthHydrological Sciences Journal, 1994
- Operational estimates of areal evapotranspiration and their significance to the science and practice of hydrologyJournal of Hydrology, 1983
- River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principlesJournal of Hydrology, 1970