Failure of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis
- 1 February 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 43 (2), 401-410
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000000713
Abstract
To identify risk factors for failure of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients in the ICU. Multivariable regression analysis of thrombosis predictors from a randomized thromboprophylaxis trial. Sixty-seven medical-surgical ICUs in six countries. Three thousand seven hundred forty-six medical-surgical critically ill patients. All patients received anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin at standard doses. Independent predictors for venous thromboembolism, proximal leg deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism developing during critical illness were assessed. A total of 289 patients (7.7%) developed venous thromboembolism. Predictors of thromboprophylaxis failure as measured by development of venous thromboembolism included a personal or family history of venous thromboembolism (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.03–2.59; p = 0.04) and body mass index (hazard ratio, 1.18 per 10-point increase; 95% CI, 1.04–1.35; p = 0.01). Increasing body mass index was also a predictor for developing proximal leg deep vein thrombosis (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06–1.46; p = 0.007), which occurred in 182 patients (4.9%). Pulmonary embolism occurred in 47 patients (1.3%) and was associated with body mass index (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.02–1.83; p = 0.035) and vasopressor use (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.01–3.35; p = 0.046). Low-molecular-weight heparin (in comparison to unfractionated heparin) thromboprophylaxis lowered pulmonary embolism risk (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27–0.95; p = 0.034) while statin use in the preceding week lowered the risk of proximal leg deep vein thrombosis (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27–0.77; p = 0.004). Failure of standard thromboprophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin is more likely in ICU patients with elevated body mass index, those with a personal or family history of venous thromboembolism, and those receiving vasopressors. Alternate management or incremental risk reduction strategies may be needed in such patients.This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pulmonary embolism in mechanically ventilated patients requiring computed tomographyCritical Care Medicine, 2012
- Inflammation and coagulationCritical Care Medicine, 2010
- A Randomized Trial of Rosuvastatin in the Prevention of Venous ThromboembolismThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Venous thromboembolism in critically ill patientsThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2009
- Venous thromboembolism and bleeding in critically ill patients with severe renal insufficiency receiving dalteparin prophylaxis: prevalence, incidence and risk factorsCritical Care, 2008
- Erythropoietin-receptor agonists in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2007
- Deep venous thrombosis in medical-surgical critically ill patients: Prevalence, incidence, and risk factorsCritical Care Medicine, 2005
- Deep vein thrombosis during prolonged mechanical ventilation despite prophylaxisCritical Care Medicine, 2002
- A rapid assay for the detection of circulating D-dimer is associated with clinical outcomes among critically ill patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985