Loss of Different Inverted Repeat Copies from the Chloroplast Genomes of Pinaceae and Cupressophytes and Influence of Heterotachy on the Evaluation of Gymnosperm Phylogeny
Open Access
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Genome Biology and Evolution
- Vol. 3, 1284-1295
- https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evr095
Abstract
The relationships among the extant five gymnosperm groups—gnetophytes, Pinaceae, non-Pinaceae conifers (cupressophytes), Ginkgo, and cycads—remain equivocal. To clarify this issue, we sequenced the chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) from two cupressophytes, Cephalotaxus wilsoniana and Taiwania cryptomerioides, and 53 common chloroplast protein-coding genes from another three cupressophytes, Agathis dammara, Nageia nagi, and Sciadopitys verticillata, and a non-Cycadaceae cycad, Bowenia serrulata. Comparative analyses of 11 conifer cpDNAs revealed that Pinaceae and cupressophytes each lost a different copy of inverted repeats (IRs), which contrasts with the view that the same IR has been lost in all conifers. Based on our structural finding, the character of an IR loss no longer conflicts with the “gnepines” hypothesis (gnetophytes sister to Pinaceae). Chloroplast phylogenomic analyses of amino acid sequences recovered incongruent topologies using different tree-building methods; however, we demonstrated that high heterotachous genes (genes that have highly different rates in different lineages) contributed to the long-branch attraction (LBA) artifact, resulting in incongruence of phylogenomic estimates. Additionally, amino acid compositions appear more heterogeneous in high than low heterotachous genes among the five gymnosperm groups. Removal of high heterotachous genes alleviated the LBA artifact and yielded congruent and robust tree topologies in which gnetophytes and Pinaceae formed a sister clade to cupressophytes (the gnepines hypothesis) and Ginkgo clustered with cycads. Adding more cupressophyte taxa could not improve the accuracy of chloroplast phylogenomics for the five gymnosperm groups. In contrast, removal of high heterotachous genes from data sets is simple and can increase confidence in evaluating the phylogeny of gymnosperms.Keywords
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved Phylogenomic Taxon Sampling Noticeably Affects Nonbilaterian RelationshipsMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2010
- Implications of the Plastid Genome Sequence of Typha (Typhaceae, Poales) for Understanding Genome Evolution in PoaceaeJournal of Molecular Evolution, 2010
- Comparative Chloroplast Genomics Reveals the Evolution of Pinaceae Genera and SubfamiliesGenome Biology and Evolution, 2010
- Using Phylogenomic Patterns and Gene Ontology to Identify Proteins of Importance in Plant EvolutionGenome Biology and Evolution, 2010
- PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular datingBioinformatics, 2009
- Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic “supergroups”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Complete plastid genome sequence of the chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and the phylogenetic distribution of rps12 and clpP intron losses among legumes (Leguminosae)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2008
- A Mixed Branch Length Model of Heterotachy Improves Phylogenetic AccuracyMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2008
- Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patternsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed modelsBioinformatics, 2006