Does Minimally Invasive Vein Harvesting Technique Affect the Quality of the Conduit for Coronary Revascularization?
- 31 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 80 (6), 2407-2414
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: Six-month patency ratesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2005
- Are wound healing disturbances and length of hospital stay reduced with minimally invasive vein harvest? A meta-analysisEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- Early quantitative coronary angiography of saphenous vein grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting harvested by means of open versus endoscopic saphenectomy: a prospective randomized trialThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2004
- Long-term patency of coronary grafts with endoscopically harvested saphenous veins determined by contrast-enhanced electron beam computed tomographyThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2004
- Endoscopic vs. Conventional Vein Harvesting:First Results with a New, Non-Disposable SystemThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 2001
- Routine minimal invasive vein harvesting reduces postoperative morbidity in cardiac bypass procedures. Clinical report of 1400 patients*1European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1999
- Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting versus ‘open’ technique. A prospective studyEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1998
- Assessment of human long saphenous vein function with minimally invasive harvesting with the Mayo stripperEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985