Electronic Cigarettes. A Position Statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies
- 15 September 2014
- journal article
- practice guideline
- Published by American Thoracic Society in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 190 (6), 611-618
- https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201407-1198pp
Abstract
Background: Awareness and usage of electronic cigarettes has exponentially increased during the last few years, especially among young people and women in some countries. The rapid acceptance of electronic cigarettes may be attributed in part to the perception created by marketing and the popular press that they are safer than combustible cigarettes. Goals: To alert and advise policy makers about electronic cigarettes and their potential hazards. Methods: Using The Union’s position paper on electronic cigarettes as the starting template, the document was written using an iterative process. Portions of the manuscript have been taken directly from the position papers of participating societies. Results: Because electronic cigarettes generate less tar and carcinogens than combustible cigarettes, use of electronic cigarettes may reduce disease caused by those components. However, the health risks of electronic cigarettes have not been adequately studied. Studies looking at whether electronic cigarettes can aid smoking cessation have had inconsistent results. Moreover, the availability of electronic cigarettes may have an overall adverse health impact by increasing initiation and reducing cessation of combustible nicotine delivery products. Conclusions: The health and safety claims regarding electronic nicotine delivery devices should be subject to evidentiary review. The potential benefits of electronic cigarettes to an individual smoker should be weighed against potential harm to the population of increased social acceptability of smoking and use of nicotine, the latter of which has addictive power and untoward effects. As a precaution, electronic nicotine delivery devices should be restricted or banned until more information about their safety is available. If they are allowed, they should be closely regulated as medicines or tobacco products.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as Tobacco Cigarettes Substitute: A Prospective 12-Month Randomized Control Design StudyPLOS ONE, 2013
- Metal and Silicate Particles Including Nanoparticles Are Present in Electronic Cigarette Cartomizer Fluid and AerosolPLOS ONE, 2013
- Acute impact of active and passive electronic cigarette smoking on serum cotinine and lung functionInhalation Toxicology, 2013
- Comparison of electronic cigarette refill fluid cytotoxicity using embryonic and adult modelsReproductive Toxicology, 2012
- Use of Emerging Tobacco Products in the United StatesJournal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012
- Pathogenesis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Role of Nicotine and Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorsMediators of Inflammation, 2012
- Novel Nicotine Delivery Systems and Public Health: The Rise of the “E-Cigarette”American Journal of Public Health, 2010
- Nicotine AddictionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Long-Term Consequences of Fetal and Neonatal Nicotine Exposure: A Critical ReviewToxicological Sciences, 2010
- Electronic nicotine delivery devices: ineffective nicotine delivery and craving suppression after acute administrationTobacco Control, 2010