You don't always get what you pay for: Measuring depression with short and simple versus long and sophisticated scales
- 31 March 1984
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Research in Personality
- Vol. 18 (1), 81-98
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(84)90040-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The act frequency analysis of interpersonal dispositions: Aloofness, gregariousness, dominance and submissiveness1Journal of Personality, 1981
- Construction Strategies for Multiscale Personality InventoriesApplied Psychological Measurement, 1978
- A Comparative Study of Four Depression Rating ScalesAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1975
- Comparative validity of traditional versus S-R format inventories of interpersonal behaviorJournal of Research in Personality, 1974
- Comparative validity of strategies and indices for differential diagnosis of depressive states from other psychiatric conditions using the MMPI.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974
- In response to Jackson's challenge: The comparative validity of personality scales constructed by the external (empirical) strategy and scales developed intuitively by experts, novices, and laymenJournal of Research in Personality, 1973
- Some Principles of Interest MeasurementEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1970
- Rating Scales As Measures of Clinical Judgment II: the Reliability of Example-Anchored Scales Under Conditions of Rater Heterogeneity and Divergent Behavior SamplingEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1970
- Comparative validity of different strategies of constructing personality inventory scales.Psychological Bulletin, 1967
- A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSIONJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1960