Maturity of teledermatology evaluation research: a systematic literature review
- 12 December 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Dermatology
- Vol. 156 (3), 412-419
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07627.x
Abstract
Background There is a growing interest in teledermatology in today's clinical practice, but the maturity of the evaluation research of this technology is still unclear. Objectives This systematic review describes the maturity of teledermatology evaluation research over time and explores what kind of teledermatology outcome measures have been evaluated. Methods Systematic review of literature found in Medline database (1966 up to April 2006). A telemedicine evaluation strategy consisting of four consecutive research phases (parallel to drug and diagnostics evaluation research) extended with a fifth postimplementation phase was used to classify all included studies by two independent reviewers. In addition, main characteristics (store‐and‐forward or real‐time, study design, outcome measures) were registered. Results Three hundred and forty‐five papers were systematically selected from Medline, and 244 papers were excluded. For two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), multiple papers in phase III were found. After correcting for this, 99 studies remained included (11 phase I, 72 phase II, two phase III, six phase IV, eight postimplementation phase). The number of phase II studies is the largest and still growing, while other phases are much less represented. Diagnostic accuracy was the most often used outcome measure and was found in phase I, II and IV. Store‐and‐forward teledermatology has been evaluated more since 2001, but most phase IV studies (RCTs, including cost aspects) are on real‐time teledermatology. Conclusions Most teledermatology evaluation studies are classified as feasibility studies (phase II). The number of phase III and IV studies remains low through the years. Compared with other specialties in telemedicine (i.e. telesurgery, telepaediatrics), teledermatology seems to be a mature application. However, more evaluation studies with a focus on clinical outcomes such as preventable referrals or time to recovery are needed to prove that teledermatology indeed is a promising and cost‐saving technology.Keywords
This publication has 98 references indexed in Scilit:
- Teledermatoscopy as a triage system for pigmented lesions: a pilot study.Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 2006
- Operational teledermatology in Broken Hill, rural AustraliaAustralasian Journal of Dermatology, 2005
- Wound Teleconsultation in Patients with Chronic Leg UlcersDermatology, 2005
- Web Site for Training Nonmedical Health-Care Workers to Identify Potentially Malignant Skin Lesions and for TeledermatologyTelemedicine and e-Health, 2002
- Telemedicine Versus In-Person Dermatology Referrals: An Analysis of Case ComplexityTelemedicine and e-Health, 2002
- 5.3.2. Teledermatoscopy in Daily Routine - Results of the First 100 CasesCurrent problems in dermatology, 2002
- Teledermatology in a Capitated Delivery System Using Distributed Information Architecture: Design and DevelopmentTelemedicine Journal, 1999
- Comparison of teleconsultations and face-to-face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology studyBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1998
- Telemedicine evaluation of cutaneous diseases: A blinded comparative studyJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1998
- Reliability of dermatology teleconsultations with the use of teleconferencing technologyJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1997