A solution to minimum sample size for regressions
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 21 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 15 (2), e0229345
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229345
Abstract
Regressions and meta-regressions are widely used to estimate patterns and effect sizes in various disciplines. However, many biological and medical analyses use relatively low sample size (N), contributing to concerns on reproducibility. What is the minimum N to identify the most plausible data pattern using regressions? Statistical power analysis is often used to answer that question, but it has its own problems and logically should follow model selection to first identify the most plausible model. Here we make null, simple linear and quadratic data with different variances and effect sizes. We then sample and use information theoretic model selection to evaluate minimum N for regression models. We also evaluate the use of coefficient of determination (R2) for this purpose; it is widely used but not recommended. With very low variance, both false positives and false negatives occurred at N < 8, but data shape was always clearly identified at N ≥ 8. With high variance, accurate inference was stable at N ≥ 25. Those outcomes were consistent at different effect sizes. Akaike Information Criterion weights (AICc wi) were essential to clearly identify patterns (e.g., simple linear vs. null); R2 or adjusted R2 values were not useful. We conclude that a minimum N = 8 is informative given very little variance, but minimum N ≥ 25 is required for more variance. Alternative models are better compared using information theory indices such as AIC but not R2 or adjusted R2. Insufficient N and R2-based model selection apparently contribute to confusion and low reproducibility in various disciplines. To avoid those problems, we recommend that research based on regressions or meta-regressions use N ≥ 25.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- META‐ANALYSIS OF ECONOMICS RESEARCH REPORTING GUIDELINESJournal of Economic Surveys, 2013
- The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandonedTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2013
- A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysisResearch Synthesis Methods, 2010
- Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regressionInternational Journal of Clinical Practice, 2009
- Multiplicative by nature: Why logarithmic transformation is necessary in allometryJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2009
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2005
- How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?Statistics in Medicine, 2002
- The Insignificance of Null Hypothesis Significance TestingPolitical Research Quarterly, 1999
- How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression AnalysisMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1991
- A Primer of Multivariate StatisticsBiometrics, 1975