Exposure to the Sobriety “Checkpoint Strikeforce” Campaign in Maryland: Impact on Driver Perceptions of Vulnerability and Behavior
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Traffic Injury Prevention
- Vol. 5 (2), 101-106
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15389580490434908
Abstract
To compare drivers who were: (1) exposed to Maryland's sobriety "Checkpoint Strikeforce" campaign; (2) not exposed but were aware of it; and (3) neither exposed nor aware of it. This six-month campaign involved periodic road-side sobriety checkpoints, in which police attempted to detect and arrest drunk drivers and a series of radio Public Service Announcements (PSAs) that promoted public awareness. A statewide sample of 1725 drivers were interviewed by telephone to determine their exposure to and awareness of this campaign, as well as their beliefs and behaviors concerning drunk driving and seat belt usage. Relatively few people (9.6%) were exposed in any way to the campaign; however almost 30% were aware of it. Significant increases in perceived vulnerability to arrest for drinking and driving were found among those who were exposed. There were no differences in reported drinking and driving, but seat belt usage in the last 30 days was higher among those who were exposed. There were no differences among those people who had been directly exposed to the campaign (i.e., personally gone through a sobriety checkpoint) and those who were indirectly exposed (i.e., knew a family member or someone else who went through a checkpoint). Exposure to a sobriety checkpoint was associated with increased perceptions of drink-driving risk (i.e., likelihood of getting caught by the police), which was not dependent upon having personally experienced it. Awareness without exposure appears to be insufficient to change perceived risk. The need to increase the reach and frequency of the sobriety "Checkpoint Strikeforce" campaign is indicated.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effectiveness of Injury Prevention Strategies: What Does the Public Believe?Health Education & Behavior, 2003
- Why are sobriety checkpoints not widely adopted as an enforcement strategy in the United States?Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2003
- Effectiveness of Sobriety Checkpoints for Reducing Alcohol-Involved CrashesTraffic Injury Prevention, 2002
- Lowering state legal blood alcohol limits to 0.08%: the effect on fatal motor vehicle crashes.American Journal of Public Health, 1996
- An assessment of county programs to reduce driving while intoxicatedHealth Education Research, 1990
- Traffic safety effects of sobriety checkpoints and other local DWI programs in New Jersey.American Journal of Public Health, 1989
- The precaution adoption process.Health Psychology, 1988
- The relationships among driving while impaired charges, police drinking—driving roadcheck activity, media coverage and alcohol-related casualty traffic accidentsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1985