Strategies for Increasing Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Systematic Review
Open Access
- 9 November 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 7 (11), e1000368
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000368
Abstract
Recruitment of participants into randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is critical for successful trial conduct. Although there have been two previous systematic reviews on related topics, the results (which identified specific interventions) were inconclusive and not generalizable. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relative effectiveness of recruitment strategies for participation in RCTs. A systematic review, using the PRISMA guideline for reporting of systematic reviews, that compared methods of recruiting individual study participants into an actual or mock RCT were included. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and reference lists of relevant studies. From over 16,000 titles or abstracts reviewed, 396 papers were retrieved and 37 studies were included, in which 18,812 of at least 59,354 people approached agreed to participate in a clinical RCT. Recruitment strategies were broadly divided into four groups: novel trial designs (eight studies), recruiter differences (eight studies), incentives (two studies), and provision of trial information (19 studies). Strategies that increased people's awareness of the health problem being studied (e.g., an interactive computer program [relative risk (RR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–2.18], attendance at an education session [RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.28], addition of a health questionnaire [RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.14–1.66]), or a video about the health condition (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.11–2.74), and also monetary incentives (RR1.39, 95% CI 1.13–1.64 to RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28–1.84) improved recruitment. Increasing patients' understanding of the trial process, recruiter differences, and various methods of randomisation and consent design did not show a difference in recruitment. Consent rates were also higher for nonblinded trial design, but differential loss to follow up between groups may jeopardise the study findings. The study's main limitation was the necessity of modifying the search strategy with subsequent search updates because of changes in MEDLINE definitions. The abstracts of previous versions of this systematic review were published in 2002 and 2007. Recruitment strategies that focus on increasing potential participants' awareness of the health problem being studied, its potential impact on their health, and their engagement in the learning process appeared to increase recruitment to clinical studies. Further trials of recruitment strategies that target engaging participants to increase their awareness of the health problems being studied and the potential impact on their health may confirm this hypothesis. Please see later in the article for the Editors' SummaryKeywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extending Acute Trials to Remote PopulationsStroke, 2009
- An Educational Video to Increase Clinical Trials Enrollment among Lung Cancer PatientsJournal of Thoracic Oncology, 2008
- A randomised controlled study of an audiovisual patient information intervention on informed consent and recruitment to cancer clinical trialsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Strategies to improve recruitment to research studiesPublished by Wiley ,2007
- Breast cancer prevention in community clinics: will low-income Latina patients participate in clinical trials?Preventive Medicine, 2005
- Does sending a home safety questionnaire increase recruitment to an injury prevention trial? A randomised controlled trialJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2001
- Effectiveness of Monetary Incentives for Recruiting Adolescents to an Intervention Trial to Reduce SmokingPreventive Medicine, 2000
- Evaluating the benefits of a patient information video during the informed consent processPatient Education and Counseling, 1997
- Presenting clinical trial information: a comparison of methodsPatient Education and Counseling, 1995
- Randomised comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment for cancer.BMJ, 1986