Summation Priming and Coarse Semantic Coding in the Right Hemisphere
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Vol. 6 (1), 26-45
- https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.26
Abstract
There are now numerous observations of subtle right hemisphere (RH) contributions to language comprehension. It has been suggested that these contributions reflect coarse semantic coding in the RH. That is, the RH weakly activates large semantic fields—including concepts distantly related to the input word—whereas the left hemisphere (LH) strongly activates small semantic fields—limited to concepts closely related to the input (Beeman, 1993a,b). This makes the RH less effective at interpreting single words, but more sensitive to semantic overlap of multiple words. To test this theory, subjects read target words preceded by either “Summation” primes (three words each weakly related to the target) or Unrelated primes (three unrelated words), and target exposure duration was manipulated so that subjects correctly named about half the target words in each hemifield. In Experiment 1, subjects benefited more from Summation primes when naming target words presented to the left visual field-RH (Ivf-RH) than when naming target words presented to the right visual field-LH (rvf-LH), suggesting a RH advantage in coarse semantic coding. In Experiment 2, with a low proportion of related prime-target trials, subjects benefited more from “Direct” primes (one strong associate flanked by two unrelated words) than from Summation primes for rvf-LH target words, indicating that the LH activates closely related information much more strongly than distantly related information. Subjects benefited equally from both prime types for Ivf-RH target words, indicating that the RH activates closely related information only slightly more strongly, at best, than distantly related information. This suggests that the RH processes words with relatively coarser coding than the LH, a conclusion consistent with a recent suggestion that the RH coarsely codes visual input (Kosslyn, Chabris, Mar-solek, & Koenig, 1992).Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Semantic Processing in the Right Hemisphere May Contribute to Drawing Inferences from DiscourseBrain and Language, 1993
- Semantic additivity and semantic inhibition: Dissociable processes in the cerebral hemispheres?Brain and Language, 1992
- Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't … sometimes, some placesBrain and Language, 1990
- Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meaningsBrain and Language, 1988
- Qualitatively different organizational structures of lexical knowledge in the left and right hemisphereNeuropsychologia, 1986
- Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patientsBrain and Cognition, 1986
- Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patientsBrain and Language, 1986
- Lexical judgements after right- or left-hemisphere injuryNeuropsychologia, 1986
- The Contribution of the Right Hemisphere to the Organization of ParagraphsCortex, 1983
- Electrodermal responses to attended and nonattended significant stimuli during dichotic listening.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1982