Advancing the Use of Checklists for Evaluating Performance in Health Care
- 1 July 2014
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 89 (7), 963-965
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000285
Abstract
Patients frequently do not receive recommended therapies because performance expectations are often unclear. Clinical guidelines provide exhaustive details and recommendations, but this information is not formatted in a way that supports decision making or bedside translation of therapies. When performance expectations are unclear, it is difficult for clinicians to assess their own or others’ competence. Checklists offer hope because they codify interventions, remove ambiguity, and increase reliability of care processes. Schmutz and colleagues developed a robust methodology to create a checklist for evaluating clinical performance, which is described in this issue of Academic Medicine. In this commentary, the authors offer several points to consider as checklists become more prevalent in medical education and clinical practice. First, culture is a much larger part of the equation than the checklist; understanding what all stakeholders expect to gain will help engage checklist use. Second, the construction, validation, and maintenance of checklist evaluation tools is labor intensive, requiring innovative dissemination approaches to ensure maximum access and use of checklists. Third, integrated systems that evaluate technically specified and adaptive performance are needed because some aspects of clinical performance cannot be captured on a checklist. Fourth, checklists provide an opportunity to evaluate and improve an individual’s performance concurrently with the context in which it is delivered. A tighter connection between education and training activities and process improvement strategies will accelerate improvements in safety and quality. Schmutz and colleagues have provided advancements in performance evaluation that will help health care achieve higher-quality and safer care.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Introduction of Surgical Safety Checklists in Ontario, CanadaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Preventing Patient Harms Through Systems of CareJAMA, 2012
- Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement ProgramThe Milbank Quarterly, 2011
- Collaborative Cohort Study of an Intervention to Reduce Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Intensive Care UnitInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2011
- Impact of a statewide intensive care unit quality improvement initiative on hospital mortality and length of stay: retrospective comparative analysisBMJ, 2011
- Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety interventionBMJ Quality & Safety, 2011
- Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational studyBMJ, 2010
- Naturalistic Decision MakingHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2008
- Accuracy of Physician Self-assessment Compared With Observed Measures of CompetenceJAMA, 2006
- EXPERT AND EXCEPTIONAL PERFORMANCE: Evidence of Maximal Adaptation to Task ConstraintsAnnual Review of Psychology, 1996