Comparative effectiveness research designs: an analysis of terms and coverage in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Emtree
Open Access
- 1 April 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University Library System, University of Pittsburgh in Journal of the Medical Library Association
- Vol. 101 (2), 92-100
- https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.2.004
Abstract
We analyzed the extent to which comparative effectiveness research (CER) organizations share terms for designs, analyzed coverage of CER designs in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Emtree, and explored whether scientists use CER design terms. We developed local terminologies (LTs) and a CER design terminology by extracting terms in documents from five organizations. We defined coverage as the distribution over match type in MeSH and Emtree. We created a crosswalk by recording terms to which design terms mapped in both controlled vocabularies. We analyzed the hits for queries restricted to titles and abstracts to explore scientists' language. Pairwise LT overlap ranged from 22.64% (12/53) to 75.61% (31/41). The CER design terminology (n = 78 terms) consisted of terms for primary study designs and a few terms useful for evaluating evidence, such as opinion paper and systematic review. Patterns of coverage were similar in MeSH and Emtree (gamma = 0.581, P = 0.002). Stakeholder terminologies vary, and terms are inconsistently covered in MeSH and Emtree. The CER design terminology and crosswalk may be useful for expert searchers. For partially mapped terms, queries could consist of free text for modifiers such as nonrandomized or interrupted added to broad or related controlled terms.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Search filter precision can be improved by NOTing out irrelevant content.2011
- EBM, HTA, and CER: Clearing the ConfusionThe Milbank Quarterly, 2010
- Development and evaluation of a study design typology for human research.2009
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groupsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007
- Inventory of research methods for librarianship and informatics.2004
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiativeBMJ, 2003
- The structure of science information.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2002