High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination
Open Access
- 4 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 34 (1), 90-97
- https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6395
Abstract
Objectives To determine the ability to correctly identify Cesarean section scars, to estimate the prevalence of defective scars, and to determine the size and location of scar defects by transvaginal ultrasound imaging. Methods Two hundred and eighty-seven women underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination 6–9 months after delivery: 108 had undergone one Cesarean section, 43 had had two Cesarean sections, 11 had undergone at least three Cesarean sections, and 125 were primiparae who had delivered vaginally. The ultrasound examiner was blinded to the obstetric history until all scans had been evaluated. Results None of the 125 vaginally delivered women had a visible scar in the uterus, whereas all women who had undergone Cesarean section had at least one visible scar. Median myometrial thickness at the level of the isthmus was 11.6 mm in women who had only been delivered vaginally, and 8.3 mm, 6.7 mm and 4.7 mm in women who had undergone one, two and at least three Cesarean sections, respectively (P < 0.001). Scar defects were seen in 61% (66/108), 81% (35/43) and 100% (11/11) of the women who had undergone one, two and at least three Cesarean sections (P = 0.002); at least one defect was classified as large by the ultrasound examiner in 14% (15/108), 23% (10/43) and 45% (5/11) (P = 0.027), and at least one total defect was seen in 6% (7/108), 7% (3/43) and 18% (2/11) (P = 0.336). In women who had undergone one Cesarean section, the median distance between an intact scar and the internal cervical os was 4.6 (range, 0–19) mm, and that between a deficient scar and the internal cervical os was 0 (range, 0–26) mm (P < 0.001). Conclusions Cesarean section scars can be detected reliably by ultrasound imaging. Myometrial thickness at the level of the isthmus uteri decreases with the number of Cesarean sections and the frequency of large scar defects increases. Scars with defects are located lower in the uterus than intact scars. Copyright © 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Wound angiogenesis as a function of tissue oxygen tension: A mathematical modelProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Deficient lower‐segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factorsUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Placenta Percreta Leading to Spontaneous Complete Uterine Rupture in the Second TrimesterGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 2007
- Caesarean scar pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007
- Uterine dehiscence in term pregnant patients with one previous cesarean delivery: Growth factor immunoexpression and collagen content in the scarred lower uterine segmentAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006
- Ectopic pregnancies in a Caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complicationHuman Reproduction Update, 2004
- First‐trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scarUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Uterine Rupture and DehiscenceSouthern Medical Journal, 2002
- British caesarean section rates have we reached a plateau?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Comparisons of National Cesarean-Section RatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1987