The impact of study design and diagnostic approach in a large multi-centre ADHD study: Part 2: Dimensional measures of psychopathology and intelligence
Open Access
- 7 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Psychiatry
- Vol. 11 (1), 1-17
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244x-11-55
Abstract
The International Multi-centre ADHD Genetics (IMAGE) project with 11 participating centres from 7 European countries and Israel has collected a large behavioural and genetic database for present and future research. Behavioural data were collected from 1068 probands with ADHD and 1446 unselected siblings. The aim was to describe and analyse questionnaire data and IQ measures from all probands and siblings. In particular, to investigate the influence of age, gender, family status (proband vs. sibling), informant, and centres on sample homogeneity in psychopathological measures. Conners' Questionnaires, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires, and Wechsler Intelligence Scores were used to describe the phenotype of the sample. Data were analysed by use of robust statistical multi-way procedures. Besides main effects of age, gender, informant, and centre, there were considerable interaction effects on questionnaire data. The larger differences between probands and siblings at home than at school may reflect contrast effects in the parents. Furthermore, there were marked gender by status effects on the ADHD symptom ratings with girls scoring one standard deviation higher than boys in the proband sample but lower than boys in the siblings sample. The multi-centre design is another important source of heterogeneity, particularly in the interaction with the family status. To a large extent the centres differed from each other with regard to differences between proband and sibling scores. When ADHD probands are diagnosed by use of fixed symptom counts, the severity of the disorder in the proband sample may markedly differ between boys and girls and across age, particularly in samples with a large age range. A multi-centre design carries the risk of considerable phenotypic differences between centres and, consequently, of additional heterogeneity of the sample even if standardized diagnostic procedures are used. These possible sources of variance should be counteracted in genetic analyses either by using age and gender adjusted diagnostic procedures and regional normative data or by adjusting for design artefacts by use of covariate statistics, by eliminating outliers, or by other methods suitable for reducing heterogeneity.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of study design and diagnostic approach in a large multi-centre ADHD study. Part 1: ADHD symptom patternsBMC Psychiatry, 2011
- Support for an independent familial segregation of executive and intelligence endophenotypes in ADHD familiesPsychological Medicine, 2008
- Parent and Teacher Rating Scales in the Evaluation of Attention-deficit Hyperactivity DisorderJournal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 2006
- Inhibition of Motor Responses in Siblings Concordant and Discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2005
- The effect of ADHD on the life of an individual, their family, and community from preschool to adult lifeArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2005
- Attention?Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in the post?genomic eraEuropean Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2004
- Meta-Analysis of Intellectual and Neuropsychological Test Performance in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.Neuropsychology, 2004
- Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis TestingJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1998
- Separation of DSM-III attention deficit disorder and conduct disorder: evidence from a family-genetic study of American child psychiatric patientsPsychological Medicine, 1991
- Which boys respond to stimulant medication? A controlled trial of methylphenidate in boys with disruptive behaviourPsychological Medicine, 1987